MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Pro 4 scores 0.6 points higher (26.6 vs 26.0) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($737 vs $231; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Solar Pro 4 when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 26.6 | +2.3% Solar Pro 4 is 2.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $736.82 | +218.9% Solar Pro 4 is 3.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.58s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 4 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 2.3% more intelligence, 218.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Solar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill