MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 13.8% less intelligence, 1173.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 28.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 39.9 | −13.8% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 13.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $2,632.05 | +1173.6% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.60s | 63.65s | +28.3% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 28.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
MiMo-V2.6-ProQwen3.8 2.4T A95BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill