MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Qwen3.8 Max vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 13.2% less intelligence, 1435.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 31.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 40.2 | −13.2% Qwen3.8 Max is 13.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $3,172.37 | +1435.1% Qwen3.8 Max is 15× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.82s | 64.17s | +31.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 31.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
MiMo-V2.6-ProQwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill