MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Qwen3.7 Max vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: 30.9% less intelligence, 704.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 26.5% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.7 | 29.5 | −30.9% Qwen3.7 Max is 30.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $283.18 | $2,277.12 | +704.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 8.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 22.62s | 16.63s | −26.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 26.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashQwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill