Mistral Small 3.1 vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Beam 1.0 scores 23.2 points higher (30.3 vs 7.1) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($319 vs $27.8; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Beam 1.0 when you need intelligence above 7.1, and Mistral Small 3.1 when 7.1 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Small 3.1 | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.1 | 30.3 | +326.8% Beam 1.0 is 4.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $27.82 | $318.73 | +1045.7% Beam 1.0 is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.99s | 8.02s | −33.1% Beam 1.0 is 33.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.08 / $0.14 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Mistral Small 3.1: 326.8% more intelligence, 1045.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Mistral Small 3.1Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-3-1/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-3-1/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill