Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh): 1.2% less intelligence, 6537.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 589.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.1 | 33.7 | −1.2% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 1.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $95.73 | $6,353.83 | +6537.2% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 66× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.48s | 65.35s | +589.3% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 589.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 58.30 for $5903.
Muse Ember (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember-xhigh/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember-xhigh/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill