Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) by Alibaba or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 14.0 points higher (25.2 vs 11.2) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $329; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3.7 Plus when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.2 | 25.2 | +125.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $328.86 | $427.73 | +30.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 30.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.17s | 46.03s | −0.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 0.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.20 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning): 125.0% more intelligence, 30.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 0.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-9b/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-9b/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill