Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores 15.9 points higher (45.4 vs 29.5) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($4935 vs $2277; both flagship class). Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Max.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 45.4 | +53.9% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 53.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,277.12 | $4,934.79 | +116.7% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 2.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.62s | 62.92s | +278.6% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 278.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $7.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.7 Max: 53.9% more intelligence, 116.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 278.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill