Qwen3.7 Max vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 5.4 points higher (29.5 vs 24.1) but costs 4.5× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $502; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 24.1, and Solar Mini 4 when 24.1 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 24.1 | −18.3% Solar Mini 4 is 18.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,277.12 | $502.02 | −78.0% Solar Mini 4 is 78.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.57s | 27.46s | +65.7% Solar Mini 4 is 65.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $7.50 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs Qwen3.7 Max: 18.3% less intelligence, 78.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Qwen3.7 MaxSolar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill