Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B by Alibaba or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 0.3 points higher (40.2 vs 39.9) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $2632; both flagship class). Pick Qwen3.8 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.9 | 40.2 | +0.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 0.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,632.05 | $3,172.37 | +20.5% Qwen3.8 Max is 20.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 64.84s | 63.35s | −2.3% Qwen3.8 Max is 2.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 0.8% more intelligence, 20.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill