Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) scores 17.0 points higher (26.2 vs 9.2) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1060 vs $405; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.2 | 9.2 | −64.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 64.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,060.08 | $405.10 | −61.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 61.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 55.47s | 6.21s | −88.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 88.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.50 / $3.00 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low): 64.9% less intelligence, 61.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b-low/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b-low/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill