Apodex 1.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 4.2 points higher (26.4 vs 22.2) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $366; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Apodex 1.1 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 22.2 | −15.9% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 15.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $365.63 | −61.1% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 61.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 9.51s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Apodex 1.1: 15.9% less intelligence, 61.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Apodex 1.1Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemini-3-5-flash-lite · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemini-3-5-flash-lite?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill