Celeris-1 vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-17.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Hy3
Hy3 vs Celeris-1: 240.3% more intelligence, 40.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3770.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.4 | 42.2 | +240.3% Hy3 is 3.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $156.79 | $93.60 | −40.3% Hy3 is 40.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.97s | 37.54s | +3770.1% Hy3 is 3770.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (high) scores 47.00 for $55.0.
Celeris-1Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill