Celeris-1 vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Hy3 scores 19.5 points higher (25.8 vs 6.3) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($149 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). Pick Hy3 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Celeris-1.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 25.8 | +309.5% Hy3 is 4.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $149.44 | +149.1% Hy3 is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.97s | 29.10s | +2900.0% Hy3 is 2900.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.14 / $0.55 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Hy3 vs Celeris-1: 309.5% more intelligence, 149.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2900.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 22.30 for $42.6.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 26.40 for $138.
Celeris-1Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill