Celeris-1 vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Small 3.2 scores 0.7 points higher (7.0 vs 6.3) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($122 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). Pick Mistral Small 3.2 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Celeris-1.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 7.0 | +11.1% Mistral Small 3.2 is 11.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $121.78 | +103.0% Mistral Small 3.2 is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 12.50s | +1336.8% Mistral Small 3.2 is 1336.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.2 vs Celeris-1: 11.1% more intelligence, 103.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1336.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Celeris-1Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill