Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 31.4% more intelligence, 38.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 22.2 | +31.4% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 31.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $365.63 | −38.5% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 38.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.38s | 9.59s | −60.7% Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 60.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/gemini-3-5-flash-lite · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/gemini-3-5-flash-lite?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill