DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-01.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning)
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning): 26.5% less intelligence, 49.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 13.6 | −26.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 26.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $310.24 | $462.70 | +49.1% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 49.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.00s | 5.99s | +49.8% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 49.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.20 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 42.30 for $267.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.10 for $389.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill