DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) scores 15.5 points higher (24.4 vs 8.9) but costs 8.3× as much to run the benchmark ($121 vs $14.7; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 8.9 | −63.5% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 63.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $14.68 | −87.9% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 87.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 57.72s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.02 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 63.5% less intelligence, 87.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/gemma-4-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/gemma-4-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill