Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 165.2% more intelligence, 65.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 15.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 42.7 | +165.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 2.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $283.18 | −65.6% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 65.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.94s | 23.52s | −15.8% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 15.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 2.5 ProMiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill