Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 41.0% less intelligence, 159.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 9.2 | −41.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 41.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $405.10 | +159.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.06s | 6.22s | +2.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill