Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 16.8% less intelligence, 166.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 31.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.6 | 21.3 | −16.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 16.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $93.81 | $250.18 | +166.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.21s | 4.97s | −31.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 31.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (high) scores 47.00 for $55.0.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill