Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 36.9% less intelligence, 299.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 20.5% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.0 | 10.1 | −36.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 36.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $119.06 | $476.03 | +299.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 4.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.94s | 5.52s | −20.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 20.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 22.30 for $42.6.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill