Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Beam 1.0 scores 14.7 points higher (30.3 vs 15.6) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($319 vs $156; both mid-range class). Pick Beam 1.0 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 30.3 | +94.2% Beam 1.0 is 94.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $318.73 | +104.5% Beam 1.0 is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.15s | 8.02s | +30.4% Beam 1.0 is 30.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 94.2% more intelligence, 104.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteBeam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill