Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 3.1 points higher (32.6 vs 29.5) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $2277; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Max.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 29.5 | −9.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 9.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $2,277.12 | −46.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 46.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.46s | 16.67s | +1.3% Qwen3.7 Max is 1.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 9.5% less intelligence, 46.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill