Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 23.3% more intelligence, 24.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 277.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 40.2 | +23.3% Qwen3.8 Max is 23.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $3,172.37 | −24.9% Qwen3.8 Max is 24.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.65s | 62.83s | +277.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 277.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill