Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) by Google or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-04.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) scores 23.1 points higher (54.2 vs 31.1) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($5725 vs $2169; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (Low).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 54.2 | 31.1 | −42.6% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 42.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,725.02 | $2,168.65 | −62.1% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 62.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.28s | 15.60s | −4.2% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 4.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Low): 42.6% less intelligence, 62.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill