GLM-5.3-Flash vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3-Flash scores 16.5 points higher (41.8 vs 25.3) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($306 vs $150; both mid-range class). Pick GLM-5.3-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Hy3.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 25.3 | −39.5% Hy3 is 39.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $305.52 | $149.61 | −51.0% Hy3 is 51.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.33s | 33.29s | −15.4% Hy3 is 15.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Hy3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 39.5% less intelligence, 51.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 15.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GLM-5.3-FlashHy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill