GPT-5 mini (High) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 12.7 points higher (29.5 vs 16.8) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $189; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 16.8, and GPT-5 mini (High) when 16.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5 mini (High) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.8 | 29.5 | +75.6% Qwen3.7 Max is 75.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $188.66 | $2,277.12 | +1107.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 12× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 58.72s | 16.57s | −71.8% Qwen3.7 Max is 71.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $2.00 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5 mini (High): 75.6% more intelligence, 1107.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GPT-5 mini (High)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill