GPT-5 mini (High) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Beam 1.0 scores 13.5 points higher (30.3 vs 16.8) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($319 vs $189; both mid-range class). Pick Beam 1.0 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5 mini (High).
| Metric | GPT-5 mini (High) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.8 | 30.3 | +80.4% Beam 1.0 is 80.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $188.66 | $318.73 | +68.9% Beam 1.0 is 68.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 58.74s | 7.58s | −87.1% Beam 1.0 is 87.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $2.00 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs GPT-5 mini (High): 80.4% more intelligence, 68.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5 mini (High)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill