GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 4.1 points higher (55.1 vs 51.0) but costs 4.7× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $662; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 51.0, and GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when 51.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.0 | 55.1 | +8.0% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 8.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $662.28 | $3,117.31 | +370.7% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 4.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 86.31s | 42.64s | −50.6% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 50.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh): 8.0% more intelligence, 370.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 50.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill