GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) scores 25.7 points higher (33.5 vs 7.8) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($154 vs $131; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 7.8 | −76.7% Solar Pro 3 is 76.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $153.58 | $131.21 | −14.6% Solar Pro 3 is 14.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.76s | 18.37s | +171.7% Solar Pro 3 is 171.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning): 76.7% less intelligence, 14.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 171.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill