Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 21.0 points higher (46.3 vs 25.3) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $150; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Hy3.
| Metric | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 46.3 | +83.0% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 83.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $206.66 | +38.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 38.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.29s | 48.29s | +45.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 45.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Hy3: 83.0% more intelligence, 38.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 45.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Hy3MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill