Hy3 vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 4.2 points higher (29.5 vs 25.3) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $150; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 25.3, and Hy3 when 25.3 is enough.
| Metric | Hy3 | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 29.5 | +16.6% Qwen3.7 Max is 16.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $2,277.12 | +1422.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 15× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.29s | 16.61s | −50.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 50.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Hy3: 16.6% more intelligence, 1422.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 50.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Hy3Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill