Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 12.4 points higher (55.1 vs 42.7) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $283; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 42.7, and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when 42.7 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 42.7 | −22.5% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 22.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $283.18 | −90.9% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 90.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 42.64s | 25.34s | −40.6% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 40.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 22.5% less intelligence, 90.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Kimi K3.1 ProMiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill