Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 36.1 points higher (43.9 vs 7.8) but costs 9.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1552 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 7.8 | −82.2% Solar Pro 3 is 82.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,551.81 | $159.22 | −89.7% Solar Pro 3 is 89.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 18.89s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: 82.2% less intelligence, 89.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill