Ling 3.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.1 Flash by InclusionAI or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash scores 11.9 points higher (41.1 vs 29.2) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1015 vs $538; both premium class). Pick Ling 3.1 Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiniMax-M3.
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.1 | 29.2 | −29.0% MiniMax-M3 is 29.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,014.56 | $537.98 | −47.0% MiniMax-M3 is 47.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.64s | 25.47s | +86.7% MiniMax-M3 is 86.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs Ling 3.1 Flash: 29.0% less intelligence, 47.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 86.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.1 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Ling 3.1 FlashMiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill