Ling 3.1 Flash vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.1 Flash by InclusionAI or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash scores 14.5 points higher (41.1 vs 26.6) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1015 vs $737; both premium class). Pick Ling 3.1 Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 4.
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.1 | 26.6 | −35.3% Solar Pro 4 is 35.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,014.56 | $736.82 | −27.4% Solar Pro 4 is 27.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.66s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 4 vs Ling 3.1 Flash: 35.3% less intelligence, 27.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.1 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Ling 3.1 FlashSolar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill