LongCat 2.0 vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: LongCat 2.0 by LongCat or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 vs LongCat 2.0: 14.1% more intelligence, 88.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | LongCat 2.0 | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 19.1 | 21.8 | +14.1% MiMo-V2.5 is 14.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.74 | $61.93 | −88.6% MiMo-V2.5 is 88.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.69s | 46.61s | +30.6% MiMo-V2.5 is 30.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $2.95 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
LongCat 2.0MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill