MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 1.9% less intelligence, 2287.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 45.4 | −1.9% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 1.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $4,934.79 | +2287.9% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 24× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.29s | 63.23s | +30.9% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 30.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
MiMo-V2.6-ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill