MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 34.9 points higher (42.7 vs 7.8) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.7 | 7.8 | −81.7% Solar Pro 3 is 81.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $283.18 | $159.22 | −43.8% Solar Pro 3 is 43.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.52s | 18.89s | −19.7% Solar Pro 3 is 19.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: 81.7% less intelligence, 43.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashSolar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill