MiniMax-M3 vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 0.3 points higher (29.5 vs 29.2) but costs 4.2× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $538; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 29.2, and MiniMax-M3 when 29.2 is enough.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.2 | 29.5 | +1.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 1.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $537.98 | $2,277.12 | +323.3% Qwen3.7 Max is 4.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.25s | 16.67s | −34.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 34.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs MiniMax-M3: 1.0% more intelligence, 323.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 34.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
MiniMax-M3Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill