Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Step 3.7 Flash

Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Step 3.7 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.7 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
19.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Step 3.7 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.719.5−27.0% Step 3.7 Flash is 27.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)16.26s18.73s+15.2% Step 3.7 Flash is 15.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.11 / $0.33$0.20 / $1.15
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats itStep 3.7 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/step-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/step-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill