Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta scores 6.3 points higher (24.0 vs 17.7) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($397 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Beam 1.0.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 17.7 | −26.3% Beam 1.0 is 26.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $249.83 | −37.0% Beam 1.0 is 37.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 7.10s | −41.2% Beam 1.0 is 41.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 26.3% less intelligence, 37.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaBeam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill