Celeris-1 vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 33.9 points higher (40.2 vs 6.3) but costs 53× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $60.0; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 40.2 | +538.1% Qwen3.8 Max is 6.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $3,172.37 | +5188.2% Qwen3.8 Max is 53× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 62.83s | +7121.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 7121.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Celeris-1: 538.1% more intelligence, 5188.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7121.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Celeris-1Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill