Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 7.7 points higher (41.2 vs 33.5) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($158 vs $154; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 33.5 | −18.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 18.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $153.58 | −2.5% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 2.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 75.35s | 6.61s | −91.2% GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-re… is 91.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 18.7% less intelligence, 2.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill