Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback): 0.9% more intelligence, 67.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.3 | 42.7 | +0.9% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 0.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $860.33 | $283.18 | −67.1% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 67.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.52s | 22.62s | +96.4% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 96.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-low/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-low/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill