Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-04.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 76.0% more intelligence, 0.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 47.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.8 | 54.2 | +76.0% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 76.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,763.75 | $5,725.02 | −0.7% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 0.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.05s | 16.28s | −47.6% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 47.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/gemini-4-carbon-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/gemini-4-carbon-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill