Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
Mistral Small 3.2 vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 21.3% less intelligence, 729.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 77.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 7.0 | −21.3% Mistral Small 3.2 is 21.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | $121.78 | +729.6% Mistral Small 3.2 is 8.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 56.02s | 12.77s | −77.2% Mistral Small 3.2 is 77.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill