GPT-5 mini (High) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 8.4 points higher (25.2 vs 16.8) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $189; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3.7 Plus when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5 mini (High).
| Metric | GPT-5 mini (High) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.8 | 25.2 | +50.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 50.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $188.66 | $427.73 | +126.7% Qwen3.7 Plus is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 58.74s | 46.21s | −21.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 21.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $2.00 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-5 mini (High): 50.0% more intelligence, 126.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 21.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5 mini (High)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill