Granite 4.2 3B vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 3B by IBM or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Hy3 scores 16.2 points higher (25.3 vs 9.1) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($150 vs $14.9; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Hy3 when you need intelligence above 9.1, and Granite 4.2 3B when 9.1 is enough.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 3B | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.1 | 25.3 | +178.0% Hy3 is 2.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.91 | $149.61 | +903.4% Hy3 is 10× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.30s | 33.29s | −5.7% Hy3 is 5.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.03 / $0.12 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Hy3 vs Granite 4.2 3B: 178.0% more intelligence, 903.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 5.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Granite 4.2 3BHy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-3b/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-3b/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill